Aba journal is Blawgging this: Of the seven judges on a New York chief judge short list passed to the governor by the State Commission on Judicial Nomination, not one is a woman. And that has Gov. David A. Paterson and Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo a little peeved. "All we’re saying is it seems highly unusual that in a class of seven individuals considered to be capable of supervising the Court of Appeals, that not one of them would be a woman—not one," Paterson is quoted as saying. "I think it’s very unfortunate." http://www.abajournal.com/news/no_women_on_ny_high_courts_nominee_list/
What does THAT mean? Are WE so different then a MAN lawyer that will judge differently on the SAME cases?
Maybe they just are up set that they won't have a WOMAN to stare at all day. Its not like those robes are revealing any how.
Also, aba journal is blawgging sexist comments: "One potential loophole is that the commission is required by law not only to give the governor names, but file a report that evaluates judicial temperament."
Does THIS mean that aba journal thinks WE WOMEN are too tempermental to make the CUT?
I know many MOODY male judges and attornies, so someone needs to RETHINK that blawg.